On October 15–16, 2026, the Wall Street Journal reported that progress toward a US-Mexico agreement to reduce tariffs on automobiles, steel, and aluminum has stalled after Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick opposed significant cuts to the 25% auto tariff and the 50% tariffs on steel, aluminum, and certain downstream products. Both governments have said talks continue and denied a formal impasse. Procurement and supply-chain teams that source from Mexico should keep dual-sourcing options and updated landed-cost models ready; no rate change has been announced.
The Wall Street Journal reported on October 15 that US-Mexico talks aimed at lowering Section 232 tariffs on Mexican vehicles, steel, and aluminum had slowed after opposition from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Procurement leaders, category managers, and supply-chain operators with North American manufacturing or import exposure should care because the current 25% auto rate and 50% metals rates remain in force while negotiators seek a path that could also open further USMCA renewal discussions.
This note summarizes public reporting. It is not customs or legal advice. Confirm current rates and classifications with counsel or a licensed customs broker.
- What changed? WSJ reporting (October 15–16) indicates that near-term progress on a deal to cut the 25% tariff on Mexican automobiles and the 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum has stalled due to Lutnick’s opposition to significant reductions. Officials on both sides say talks continue.
- When? Reporting dated October 15–16, 2026. No new tariff rates or effective dates have been published.
- Who is affected? Importers of Mexican-origin vehicles, steel, aluminum, and downstream products; manufacturers with cross-border supply chains; category managers running RFPs that include Mexican suppliers.
- What to do this week? Confirm current HTS codes and duty rates on open purchase orders, update landed-cost scenarios for “status quo” versus a possible 15% auto rate, and identify dual-source options for critical SKUs.
What did the Wall Street Journal report?
According to the Journal, the United States and Mexico had been closing in on an agreement that would reduce U.S. levies on steel, aluminum, and automobiles in exchange for concessions from Mexico. The deal was expected to clear the way for further talks on renewing the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Progress slowed because of disagreements over the Section 232 tariffs administered by the Commerce Department. Lutnick has opposed significant reductions in the 25% tariff on Mexican automobiles and the 50% levies on steel, aluminum, and finished products made of those metals. Mexican officials, including Economy Secretary Marcelo Ebrard, have stated that they do not see the talks as stalled and that communication continues. A Commerce Department spokesperson told the Journal the department remains in dialogue with Mexico.
What rates are currently in force?
Public reporting describes a 25% tariff on Mexican passenger vehicles and 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum (and certain downstream products) imposed on national-security grounds. Mexico has sought rates closer to the 15% level applied to vehicles from Japan and South Korea, and has also discussed mechanisms that would recognize USMCA regional content. No formal announcement of a rate change has been made. Until a new presidential proclamation or Federal Register notice appears, the existing rates remain the operational baseline for landed-cost calculations.
Why does the timing matter for procurement?
Section 232 tariffs are administered by Commerce and can change with relatively little notice once a political agreement is reached. A stall means the status-quo rates stay in place through the current negotiation window, which some reports linked to the U.S. midterm election calendar. For buyers, that creates two practical effects: (1) near-term purchase orders and freight bookings should continue to use the higher rates, and (2) any multi-year contract or should-cost model that assumed a near-term reduction needs an explicit contingency. The same reporting notes that a similar late intervention by Lutnick contributed to the collapse of parallel talks with Canada earlier in the year, so the risk of a prolonged status quo is non-zero.
What should procurement teams do this week?
Pull the open-order report for Mexican-origin or USMCA-qualified goods that carry the auto or metals tariffs. Confirm the duty rate applied at entry and the Incoterms so that any rate change (or lack of change) is correctly allocated. Build or refresh two landed-cost scenarios: status quo (25%/50%) and a hypothetical 15% auto rate with metals relief. Identify single-source SKUs where a prolonged high tariff would justify a dual-source qualification. If a supplier is quoting “tariff-inclusive” prices, require the quote to show the duty amount separately so that a future reduction can be captured. Document the assumptions for the next category review or S&OP cycle.
What to watch next?
Watch for a joint statement, a Commerce Department or USTR press release, or a Federal Register notice. Also watch Mexican Economy Ministry comments and any movement on the broader USMCA review timeline. Secondary indicators include changes in Mexican auto export volumes, steel and aluminum shipment data, and any shift in the tone of bilateral meetings. Until those appear, treat the current rates as the planning baseline.
FAQ
Has a tariff cut been announced?
No. The reporting describes stalled progress toward a deal, not a completed agreement or a new rate schedule.
What rates are described?
Reporting cites a 25% tariff on Mexican automobiles and 50% tariffs on steel, aluminum, and certain downstream products.
Are the talks officially dead?
Both sides have denied an impasse and said dialogue continues. The WSJ reported that progress has slowed.
Should I reprice open POs?
Only if the contract allows it and only after confirming the duty actually assessed. Most teams should update scenarios rather than reopen settled orders.
Where can I verify the current rate?
U.S. Customs and Border Protection rulings, the Harmonized Tariff Schedule, and your customs broker. This note is not a substitute for those sources.
Son Güncelleme / Last Updated: October 17, 2026.
Related: U.S. Trade Deficit Hits $105.6 Billion in August · Procurement Department Hub
Discover more from Kurums | Business Intelligence
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.