Taste Note - Amazon Management Best Sellers
Nine Lies About Work: The Evidence Against HR's Favorite Rituals
A Kurums Book Taste review of Nine Lies About Work for people leaders willing to test their own orthodoxies against the data.
Why this book fits Kurums
Much of the standard people stack - cascaded goals, 360 feedback, ratings, competency models - persists because it serves organizational tidiness, not performance. Buckingham (the First, Break All the Rules researcher) and Goodall (a practitioner at Deloitte and Cisco) prosecute nine such orthodoxies with research and large-scale internal data, and propose what freethinking leaders should do instead.
For the Kurums HR audience this is the audit lens for your own machinery: whether or not you accept every verdict, each chapter names the hidden assumption inside a ritual you run - and the team-level alternatives (attention over feedback, weekly check-ins, experience over culture talk) are directly pilotable.
What the book argues
The early lies attack planning-era theology. People care which company they join (lie #1) - but engagement data shows experience varies more across teams within a company than between companies: people join companies and stay or leave teams, so the local team experience, not the culture deck, is the unit that matters. The best plan wins (#2) - except plans decay on contact; what wins is accurate, real-time intelligence pushed to the front line. Cascading goals (#3) earn the sharpest treatment: goals set above and split downward become compliance theater; what actually aligns is cascaded meaning - leaders relentlessly explaining why, while teams set their own what.
The middle lies target the measurement rituals. Well-rounded people (#4): excellence is idiosyncratic - high performers are spiky, and competency models that sand down spikes trade distinctiveness for auditability. People need feedback (#5): what people need is attention; the research favors frequent, strengths-anchored attention over corrective critique, and the weekly check-in - two questions about priorities and needed help - emerges as the highest-leverage ritual in their Cisco-scale data. People can reliably rate other people (#6) is the statistical centerpiece: raters can't - idiosyncratic rater effect swamps the signal - so 360s and calibration grids aggregate noise; ask instead about the rater's own intentions ('would I promote them? do I go to them first?'), which people can answer reliably.
The closing lies go after potential (#7 - a static label that misreads people; track momentum instead), work-life balance (#8 - balance is the wrong goal; find love-in-work, the red threads worth weaving more of), and leadership as a trait list (#9 - followers follow spikes and the certainty they project, not well-roundedness). The through-line is consistent: organizations default to control and uniformity because they scale administratively; performance lives in local, particular, team-shaped truth - and the leader's job is to defend the second against the first.
Key ideas, translated to your desk
Manage the team experience, not the brand
Engagement varies team by team, not logo by logo. Measure and manage at team level - that is where people actually quit from.
Cascade meaning, set goals locally
Explain the why until you're hoarse; let teams write their own what. Cascaded targets produce compliance, not alignment.
Ask raters about themselves
Replace 'rate their strategic thinking' with 'would you promote them today?' People are terrible lenses and honest witnesses of their own intentions.
Use it at work
- Pilot the weekly check-in - two questions, every team member, every week - in one function for a quarter.
- Re-cut your engagement data by team and manage the spread, not the average.
- Rewrite review instruments from third-party ratings to rater-intention questions.
- Audit one competency model: what spike-driven excellence is it currently penalizing?
Read it if
- You own performance, goals, or engagement machinery and suspect some of it is theater.
- You loved First, Break All the Rules and want its modern, sharper sequel.
- You need evidence to defend simplifying the people stack.
You can skip it if
- You want prescriptions without demolition; the book argues before it builds.
- Your org just installed these rituals and the appetite for heresy is zero.
- You run a five-person team - go straight to the weekly check-in and skip the war.
This book appears in
Curated Tasting Menus that chain this title into a reading route.
Discover more from Kurums | Business Intelligence
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.