Going North: Why the Pan-African Expansion Was Harder Than It Looked

The pan-African expansion thesis was right about the opportunity and wrong about the difficulty. This story covers the strategic logic, the successes in telecoms and banking, the retail retreats, currency and repatriation problems, logistics, localization and what actually determines success — part of the South Africa Company Stories hub.

What was the strategic logic?

A domestic market of limited size, already served by well-run incumbents, with growth constrained by unemployment and slow economic expansion — against a continent with the world’s fastest population growth and rising urbanization.

South African companies also believed they held a genuine advantage: experience operating in conditions of unreliable infrastructure, informal trade, currency volatility and difficult logistics that European and American competitors had never faced.

That advantage was real in some sectors and illusory in others. Operating in South Africa is not the same as operating in Lagos, Luanda or Lusaka, and the gap between them proved wider than the gap the thesis assumed.

Why did telecoms succeed?

Because the product is identical everywhere, scale economics are enormous, and the operating challenge — building and maintaining networks in difficult conditions — is exactly what South African engineering capability could supply.

Licences also created protected positions. Early entrants in markets with two or three operators enjoyed structural advantages that no later competitor could easily overcome, which converted early risk-taking into durable share.

The distribution model transferred cleanly too. Prepaid airtime sold through informal retail works the same way in every market on the continent, which meant the commercial approach needed adaptation rather than reinvention.

Why did retail struggle?

Because retail is intensely local. Product ranges must match local diets and preferences, prices must match local incomes, stores must fit local property availability and supply chains must actually deliver.

Cross-border supply was the hardest constraint. Serving stores from South African distribution centres meant customs delays, transport costs over enormous distances and stock-outs, while building local supply required scale that early store numbers could not justify.

Property compounded it. Modern retail requires shopping centres with parking, power and security, and in many markets those simply did not exist in sufficient numbers, which capped how quickly a chain could reach viable density.

What is the currency problem?

That revenue is earned in currencies which frequently depreciate against the rand and the dollar, while imported stock, equipment and debt are priced in hard currency. Margins compress even when local sales volumes grow.

Repatriation is the sharper issue. Several markets restrict or delay conversion of local profits into hard currency, which means a business can be profitable on paper while the cash is unavailable to the parent for years.

Companies have responded by funding local operations with local debt, reinvesting locally rather than repatriating, and pricing in hard currency where regulation allows — each of which reduces but does not remove the exposure.

What does localization actually require?

Local management with authority, local sourcing wherever quality permits, product ranges designed for local demand rather than adapted from a South African assortment, and pricing set against local incomes.

It also requires political and regulatory literacy. Local content rules, employment requirements, licensing and taxation vary by market and are frequently applied with discretion, which cannot be managed from a head office in Johannesburg.

The businesses that localized properly generally invested in leadership from those markets and gave them genuine decision-making power, which is expensive, slow and the most reliable predictor of whether an expansion survives.

What role does logistics play?

A determining one. Moving goods across African borders involves customs procedures, road conditions, informal costs and transit times that make just-in-time supply impossible and require far higher inventory than a South African operation carries.

Regional distribution centres solve part of the problem and require volume to justify, which creates a chicken-and-egg constraint: the supply chain needs scale, and scale needs a functioning supply chain.

The continental free trade agreement is intended to reduce these barriers over time, and its practical effect depends on implementation at borders rather than on the text of the agreement.

What about political and security risk?

It is real, uneven and frequently mispriced. Regulatory change, licence disputes, sudden tax assessments, expropriation risk and in some markets outright conflict all affect operations in ways a spreadsheet cannot easily capture.

Large regulatory penalties imposed on foreign operators in several markets demonstrated that scale and long presence are not protection, and that a government under fiscal pressure may view a profitable foreign company as a revenue source.

The mitigations are diversification across markets, local partners with genuine standing, meticulous compliance and provisioning for outcomes that do not appear in the base case.

Which businesses transfer best?

Those where the product is standardized, scale economics are large and the operating challenge is technical: telecommunications, banking infrastructure, insurance, brewing and bottling, mining services, and business-to-business industrial supply.

Those that transfer worst are consumer businesses where preference, price point and store format are locally specific, and where the supply chain must be rebuilt for each market.

The pattern is consistent internationally: businesses selling a technical capability travel well, and businesses selling a shopping experience do not.

What is the current state of the thesis?

More realistic. Companies now enter fewer markets, more deeply, with local partners and local funding, and with explicit tolerance for a longer path to profitability than the original expansion assumed.

Several groups have exited markets entirely and describe it publicly as a strategic focus decision rather than a failure, which is more honest than the alternative and reflects genuine learning.

The underlying demographics have not changed. The continent’s population and urbanization growth remain the strongest long-run consumer story anywhere, and the question was always execution rather than opportunity.

What is the lesson?

That proximity is not the same as understanding. Being African did not confer knowledge of Nigerian retail or Angolan regulation, and companies that assumed it did paid for the assumption.

The second lesson concerns the format. Exporting a South African store, product range and pricing structure fails; building a local business using South African capital, systems and technical capability works.

The third is about time horizons. Every successful African expansion took longer to reach profitability than its business case assumed, and the companies that survived were those whose balance sheets could absorb the difference.

How do banks expand across the continent?

Usually by acquiring an existing licensed institution rather than building one, because banking licences are scarce, regulators favour established entities and a functioning deposit base takes years to assemble.

The acquired bank then receives the parent’s systems, risk management, capital and correspondent relationships, which is where the value is created. A small local bank with international-grade risk systems can serve corporate customers it previously could not.

The recurring difficulty is integration. Core banking systems, credit policies and compliance standards differ enormously, and several expansions have consumed years and considerable capital simply harmonizing what was bought.

What is the role of trade finance?

Central, because African trade is heavily import-dependent and importers need letters of credit, guarantees and working capital denominated in hard currency.

Banks with correspondent relationships and dollar liquidity can supply these where local institutions cannot, which is a genuine competitive advantage and a substantial fee business.

It also carries the country risk directly. When a market runs short of foreign exchange, importers cannot settle, and the bank holding the exposure discovers that the credit risk it underwrote was really a sovereign one.

What does the informal trade mean for expansion?

That the largest share of consumer spending in most African markets happens outside formal retail, through markets, kiosks, table traders and small independents that no supermarket chain reaches.

A consumer goods company therefore succeeds by serving that trade — small pack sizes, cash terms, frequent small deliveries — rather than by waiting for formal retail to develop.

Companies that built distribution into informal channels have generally outperformed those that built stores, which is the clearest single explanation for why manufacturers succeeded where retailers did not.

Why did several groups exit and what did it cost?

Exits typically followed years of losses, trapped cash and the realization that reaching viable scale would require capital better deployed elsewhere. Write-downs on African operations have run into billions of rand across several groups.

Selling is also difficult. Buyers for a subscale retail operation in a difficult market are scarce, so exits frequently mean closure, lease settlements and redundancy costs rather than a sale.

The reputational effect at home has been to make boards considerably more cautious, which is rational and carries its own cost if it deters expansions that would have worked.

What does the future expansion model look like?

Fewer markets entered more deeply, joint ventures with local partners who bring regulatory and commercial standing, local currency funding, and explicit acceptance that profitability arrives later than a South African business case assumes.

Digital distribution changes part of the calculation, since payments, insurance, lending and media can reach customers without physical infrastructure in every market.

What has not changed is that consumer goods still require physical distribution, and the companies winning that game are the ones building it market by market rather than exporting a format from Johannesburg.

How does mobile money change the opportunity?

By creating a payment layer that reaches customers no bank branch or card network serves, which makes commerce, insurance, lending and subscription services viable in markets where collecting money was previously the binding constraint.

For a South African company entering a market, integrating with the dominant local wallet is now more important than opening an office, because it determines whether customers can actually pay.

It also shifts competitive advantage toward whoever holds the payment relationship, which is why operators and wallet providers have become the gatekeepers that retailers and banks once were.

Frequently Asked Questions