Industrial Parks Inc.: How Becamex, VSIP and Kinh Bac Sell Vietnam by the Hectare

Vietnam does not sell itself to foreign manufacturers as a country; it sells itself by the hectare, through a handful of developers who turn rice paddies into serviced industrial land and collect the rent for half a century. The developers are the layer between the state, which owns all land in Vietnam, and the investors, who need it with power, water and a road to the port attached. This article explains how the industrial park business works, how Becamex built a province, how VSIP became the Singapore brand of Vietnamese manufacturing, how Kinh Bắc captured the northern electronics boom, what the numbers look like, and where the model is under strain. It is part of the Vietnam Company Stories hub.

How does an industrial park developer in Vietnam actually make money?

The developer makes money on the spread between what it pays the state and the farmers for raw land, plus infrastructure cost, and what a tenant will pay for a serviced plot with a 50-year land-use right. In the main clusters that spread has widened from perhaps $50 a square metre a decade ago to $130–200 today, with tenants typically paying upfront for the entire remaining term.

The mechanics follow from Vietnamese land law. All land belongs to the people and is administered by the state; individuals and companies hold land-use rights. A province approves an industrial park in its master plan, the developer is allocated the land and pays compensation and resettlement costs to existing users according to provincial price frameworks, and the state grants the developer a land-use right for up to 70 years, usually 50. The developer then builds internal roads, drainage, power substations, water treatment and a wastewater plant, and sub-leases plots to manufacturers. The tenant pays either a lump sum for the remaining lease term, which is the norm, or annual rent, and in addition pays management fees and buys utilities through the developer at a margin.

The accounting is what makes the business attractive and confusing. Lump-sum lease payments are collected upfront but recognised as revenue over the lease term under Vietnamese accounting standards, or on handover under certain conditions, so developers show large deferred revenue and lumpy profits depending on when big tenants sign. Kinh Bắc’s results, for example, have swung by hundreds of percent from year to year according to whether a Foxconn or LG-sized lease closed in the period. Cash flow, meanwhile, is strong in good years and can turn sharply negative when a developer is financing clearance and infrastructure on a new park ahead of any tenant.

The ancillary businesses matter. Developers sell electricity and water, run logistics and bonded warehouses, build ready-built factories for smaller tenants who do not want to construct, and in Becamex’s case build the housing, universities and hospitals that the workers and managers of the tenants need. The park is the entry point; the city around it is the long-term earner.

How did Becamex turn Bình Dương from a rural province into an industrial one?

Becamex did it by being the province. Founded in 1976 as a state trading company and rebuilt in the 1990s under Bình Dương’s reformist leadership, Becamex IDC became the vehicle through which the province cleared land, built highways, laid out parks and, from 2010, constructed an entire new administrative city. Bình Dương went from a backwater north of Ho Chi Minh City to one of the top three FDI destinations in the country.

The key figure was Nguyễn Văn Hùng, Becamex’s long-serving chairman, who ran the company from the 1990s until his death in 2022 and was as close to a provincial industrial policymaker as Vietnam has produced. Under him Becamex developed the Mỹ Phước parks, the Bàu Bàng complex, and most importantly co-founded VSIP with Sembcorp in 1996 to bring Singaporean management and a Singaporean brand to a Vietnamese land business. It built the Mỹ Phước–Tân Vạn expressway, the province’s spine, with its own capital and toll revenue. And from 2010 it built Bình Dương New City, a 1,000-hectare planned capital with a university, a convention centre and a Japanese partner, Tokyu, for residential development.

Becamex was equitised in 2017, listed on the Ho Chi Minh Stock Exchange in 2020 under the ticker BCM, and remains about 95 percent owned by the Bình Dương provincial People’s Committee; a further divestment to bring the state stake down towards 65 percent has been discussed and repeatedly deferred. Its consolidated balance sheet is that of a diversified infrastructure group: land bank measured in thousands of hectares, an equity stake in VSIP, listed subsidiaries in construction and pharmaceuticals, and debt that has drawn periodic comment from analysts. Group revenue in recent years has been in the range of 5–9 trillion đồng with net profit that rises and falls with land handovers.

The Becamex model is now being exported. The company has taken the VSIP partnership to Bình Định, Quảng Ngãi, Nghệ An and elsewhere, and Bình Dương itself, after the 2025 administrative merger that folded the province into an enlarged Ho Chi Minh City, has become the southern industrial heartland of the country’s largest metropolis. Whether Becamex’s privileged relationship with its former province survives that merger is one of the more interesting questions in Vietnamese state capitalism.

What makes VSIP different from every other park brand?

VSIP is different because it is the only park brand in Vietnam that a foreign board of directors recognises. Created in 1996 as a joint venture between Becamex and a Sembcorp-led Singaporean consortium, with the two governments as sponsors, it sells Singaporean management standards, a one-stop licensing service and a reputation for clean dealing on top of Vietnamese land. It now operates well over a dozen parks in a dozen provinces.

The original VSIP in Thuận An, Bình Dương, was a diplomatic project as much as a commercial one: Singapore’s then prime minister Goh Chok Tong and Vietnam’s Võ Văn Kiệt launched it as a way of transferring Singapore’s Jurong-style industrial estate model to a country that had just joined ASEAN. It filled quickly with Japanese, Taiwanese and Singaporean manufacturers who wanted a landlord that spoke their language and could get a licence issued in weeks rather than months. VSIP II and VSIP III followed in Bình Dương, then Bắc Ninh in 2007, Hải Phòng in 2010, Quảng Ngãi, Hải Dương, Nghệ An, Bình Định, Quảng Trị, Cần Thơ and others through the 2010s and 2020s.

The customer list is the argument. Luxshare’s largest Vietnamese complex is in VSIP Nghệ An; Foxconn, Hanwha and Fuyu are in VSIP Bắc Ninh; Kyocera, Nipro and Bridgestone are in VSIP Hải Phòng. Sembcorp Development has said VSIP parks had attracted cumulative investment commitments on the order of $20 billion from roughly 900 tenants by the mid-2020s, employing around 300,000 people. The joint venture reports through Sembcorp’s Singapore accounts, where it has been one of the group’s more consistent contributors, and through Becamex’s equity-accounted income, where the dividends from VSIP have at times been a large share of the parent’s profit.

The lesson from VSIP is that in a country where the land is the same everywhere, the brand and the service layer command a premium. VSIP’s lease prices are at the top of the market, its occupancy is high, and its expansions into second-tier provinces such as Nghệ An have pulled anchor tenants that those provinces could not have attracted alone. It is, in effect, Vietnam’s most successful franchise, and its franchisor is a Singaporean state-linked company.

How did Kinh Bắc capture the northern electronics boom?

Kinh Bắc City Development captured it by being in Bắc Ninh before anyone else with a private park, and by landing Canon and then Foxconn in Quế Võ in the mid-2000s, which made its parks the default address for the northern electronics cluster that Samsung, Apple’s suppliers and LG subsequently built. Founder Đặng Thành Tâm turned that into a listed group with parks in Bắc Ninh, Bắc Giang, Hải Phòng and beyond.

Đặng Thành Tâm, a former shipping-line clerk who set up Tân Tạo industrial park in Ho Chi Minh City with his sister Đặng Thị Hoàng Yến in the 1990s, moved north to found Kinh Bắc in 2002 and listed it in 2007 at the peak of Vietnam’s first stock market boom. Quế Võ Industrial Park in Bắc Ninh brought Canon in 2001 and Foxconn in 2007; Tràng Duệ in Hải Phòng brought LG Display and LG Electronics with commitments running into the billions of dollars; Quang Châu in Bắc Giang houses Foxconn’s iPad and MacBook plant and part of the Apple supply chain profiled in our article on Foxconn, Luxshare and the AirPods belt. Nam Sơn–Hạp Lĩnh in Bắc Ninh landed GoerTek and Amkor’s neighbours.

The company’s history illustrates the model’s volatility. Kinh Bắc nearly failed in 2012–13 when a property downturn and high interest rates left it with unfinished parks and unserviceable debt; it survived by selling land to state-linked buyers and restructuring loans. It boomed again from 2018 as the China Plus One wave filled its northern parks, reporting record profits in some years and near-zero in others as large leases slipped between reporting periods. In 2022–23 the company again faced questions over bond repayments and a delayed capital raise during the wider Vietnamese property credit squeeze, before recovering as electronics leasing resumed.

Kinh Bắc’s land bank, at several thousand hectares across a dozen projects including large urban developments, is the asset investors buy; its leverage and its dependence on a small number of very large tenants are what they worry about. As a listed proxy for the northern electronics cluster, and by extension for Samsung’s and its neighbours’ expansion decisions, it has no close substitute on the Vietnamese exchanges.

Who else competes in the park business and how do they differ?

Beyond the big three, the market is shared by state-linked developers such as IDICO, Viglacera, Sonadezi and Saigon VRG, and by foreign specialists such as Belgium’s Deep C in Hải Phòng and Quảng Ninh and Thailand’s Amata in Đồng Nai and Quảng Ninh. Each has a different mix of provincial patronage, land bank and tenant type, and none has VSIP’s brand or Kinh Bắc’s electronics concentration.

Viglacera, originally a state building-materials group, is the landlord of Yên Phong in Bắc Ninh, where Samsung’s first plant sits, and of a string of northern parks that host Samsung suppliers, Amkor and Korean components makers; it was partly privatised and its largest shareholder is now the private conglomerate Gelex. IDICO, once under the Ministry of Construction and now private-led, holds large parks in Long An, Bà Rịa–Vũng Tàu and the north. Sonadezi is Đồng Nai’s equivalent of Becamex, with a dozen parks around Biên Hòa that house the Taiwanese footwear and Japanese manufacturing clusters. Saigon VRG, an affiliate of the state rubber group, converts rubber plantations into parks in the south-east.

The foreign specialists compete on service and on a particular tenant type. Deep C, founded by a Belgian dredging group in the 1990s in Hải Phòng, focuses on heavy industry, chemicals and logistics near the port, with an emphasis on environmental standards and renewable power that appeals to European tenants. Amata, the Thai listed developer, brought a reputation from its Chonburi estates and has hosted Japanese manufacturers in Đồng Nai since 1994, with a large Quảng Ninh project added in the 2010s.

What the whole field shares is a dependency on provincial administration. A developer is only as good as its relationship with the People’s Committee that allocates land, sets compensation and issues permits, and the 2025 merger of provinces into larger units reshuffled those relationships across the country. How the newly merged administrations treat their inherited developers, and whether they favour the former provincial champion or open the field, will shape the sector’s next decade.

What do the national numbers say about supply, demand and price?

Vietnam had more than 400 industrial parks established by 2024, about 300 of them operational, covering something over 130,000 hectares, with average occupancy around 75–80 percent nationally and higher in the Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City clusters. Lease prices in prime northern and southern parks rose to roughly $130–200 per square metre for the remaining term, up 5–10 percent a year through the early 2020s.

The demand side is foreign direct investment, which has been remarkably steady: registered FDI of roughly $36–38 billion a year in 2023 and 2024, with disbursed FDI reaching about $25 billion in 2024, a record, and manufacturing taking around two-thirds of it. Every dollar of that lands in a park. Broker reports from CBRE, Savills, JLL and Cushman & Wakefield have tracked the resulting tightness: in Bắc Ninh, Bắc Giang, Hải Phòng, Bình Dương and Đồng Nai, the best parks were effectively full by 2022, and new supply moved to second-ring provinces such as Hà Nam, Thái Bình, Nghệ An, Bà Rịa–Vũng Tàu and Long An.

Supply is constrained by clearance rather than by planning. Provinces have approved far more park area than developers have been able to clear and service, because compensation negotiations with farmers, whose land-use rights must be bought out at state-framework prices that often lag market values, take years and generate the disputes that fill Vietnamese local news. The revised Land Law that took effect in 2024, which moved compensation towards market pricing, was intended to speed this up; its early effect was to raise developer costs.

Ready-built factories and warehouses have become a distinct sub-market, led by foreign specialists such as BW Industrial (a Warburg Pincus–Becamex venture), Frasers, KCN Vietnam and SLP, which build standardised units for small and medium tenants and for logistics operators serving e-commerce. That segment has grown faster than raw land leasing and has drawn the most foreign real estate capital, because it looks like a conventional yielding property asset rather than a land-conversion trade.

What does the industrial park story mean for founders, investors and operators?

It means that the surest profits from Vietnam’s manufacturing boom have gone to whoever owned the land first, and that this trade is now largely mature in the core clusters and moving outward. For investors the developers are the cleanest listed proxy for FDI; for operators the choice of park is a decision about power, water and time as much as price; for founders the opportunities are in services around the parks rather than in developing them.

For investors, Becamex, Kinh Bắc, IDICO, Viglacera, Sonadezi and Saigon VRG offer different mixes of land bank, leverage and state ownership; foreign investors can also hold Sembcorp in Singapore for VSIP exposure or Amata in Bangkok for its Đồng Nai and Quảng Ninh parks. The common features are lumpy earnings, sensitivity to interest rates and provincial politics, and a tenant base whose fate is decided in Seoul, Taipei, Cupertino and, since 2025, Washington, as our analysis of China Plus One and the making of the world’s backup factory sets out.

For operators, the practical guidance from twenty years of foreign investment is consistent: choose the park for infrastructure and the developer for its clearance record, negotiate utilities and management fees as hard as the lease price, and check that the province’s power allocation can actually support your load, because the 2023 northern shortages cut supply to fully leased, fully paid parks. The one-stop licensing that VSIP pioneered is now offered, with varying sincerity, by most large developers and provincial management boards.

For Vietnamese founders, the parks are a customer base of roughly 900 VSIP tenants and thousands more elsewhere who need canteens, dormitories, buses, waste handling, industrial cleaning, tooling, staffing and compliance services, and who prefer local suppliers that already understand the park’s rules. The developers themselves have moved into some of these; most of the market remains fragmented. In a country whose garment factories, phone plants and chip packagers all sit inside the same fences, the services trade around those fences is one of the few genuinely local businesses the FDI boom has created.

Frequently Asked Questions