Employing in Japan means sponsoring the Certificate of Eligibility, paying a salary equal to what a Japanese national would earn for the same role (the substantive visa test), enrolling in shakai hoken (~15% employer), filing work rules with the Labour Standards Inspection Office at 10+ employees, respecting the 2019 overtime caps (criminal penalties attach), and — the defining constraint — understanding that you cannot lawfully dismiss. Foreign-worker employment must be reported to Hello Work. The strategic play for employers competing for talent: file for HSP status rather than the ordinary visa, because it gives the employee’s spouse full work rights and permanent residence in three years — a recruitment advantage that costs the employer nothing.
Japan is easy to hire into, cheap to employ in, and effectively impossible to fire from — and foreign employers consistently misjudge which of those three matters most. Social charges are moderate, the visa process is rules-based and reliable, and the talent is exceptional. But the dismissal doctrine means every Japanese hire is close to permanent, the overtime caps now carry criminal penalties, and a foreign parent that runs a Japanese subsidiary on headquarters instincts will collide with the Labour Standards Inspection Office and the labour tribunals. This guide assembles the 2026 playbook: COE sponsorship and the HSP recruitment lever, shakai hoken and payroll, work rules, overtime and harassment compliance, foreign-worker reporting, dismissal reality, contractor risk, and EOR versus entity.
What is the substantive visa test?
Equal treatment: the foreign employee’s salary must be equal to or above what a Japanese national would receive for the same work. Immigration checks this. Underpaying a foreign hire relative to local peers is the fastest route to a refused COE — and it is the one test Japan genuinely enforces.
Why should we file for HSP rather than the ordinary visa?
Because it costs you nothing and is worth a great deal to the candidate: HSP status gives their spouse full work rights (versus 28 hours part-time on the ordinary visa) and permanent residence in three years (versus ten). In a competitive hire, it is the cheapest differentiator available to a Japanese employer.
What is the biggest compliance risk?
Overtime. The 2019 caps (45 hours a month, 360 a year, with limited exceptions) carry criminal penalties, and unpaid overtime claims — particularly against employees wrongly designated as exempt ‘managers’ — are the most common and most expensive Japanese employment litigation.
How does sponsorship work, and what does the COE require?
The employer applies to the Immigration Services Agency for a Certificate of Eligibility, evidencing: the company’s substance (registration, financial statements, employee count), the job’s content and its match to the applicant’s degree or experience, and — the substantive test — the salary equal to or above a Japanese national’s for equivalent work. Processing takes one to three months; approval rates for well-documented professional cases are high.
Then the recruitment lever: file for Highly Skilled Professional status where the candidate scores 70+. It costs the employer nothing extra, and for the candidate it means their spouse can work full-time and permanent residence arrives in three years instead of ten — per our Japan visa guide. Employers who run the points calculation for their candidates, and file accordingly, win offers against employers who default to the ordinary status. Astonishingly few do it.
Ongoing duties: report the hiring and separation of foreign workers to Hello Work (the public employment service) — a mandatory notification with penalties for omission; ensure the employee’s work matches their status of residence (a designer working as a salesperson is out of status, and the employer is exposed); and support the residence renewal, which requires evidence of continued employment and tax and social-insurance compliance.
What does payroll compliance require?
Enrol employees in shakai hoken: health insurance, employees’ pension, long-term care (from 40), and employment insurance — roughly 15% employer, 15% employee, on capped standard-remuneration bands. Add workers’ accident compensation insurance (employer-only, mandatory). Withhold income tax monthly and run the year-end adjustment in December. Report and withhold inhabitant tax via special collection.
Two items foreign employers get wrong. First, commuting allowance: paying employees’ transport costs is a universal expectation (and tax-exempt up to a monthly limit) — omitting it reads as an error, not as cost discipline. Second, the bonus structure: Japanese compensation typically includes two to five months of bonus annually; a foreign employer quoting an all-in annual salary without bonuses is offering less than it appears in a market where candidates read the two differently.
And the item with permanent-residence consequences: pension and social-insurance contributions must be paid and current. The 2025 reform introduced grounds to revoke permanent residence for wilful non-payment — so an employer whose payroll practices leave gaps in an employee’s contribution record is damaging that employee’s immigration future, not merely their retirement. Foreign employers with sloppy shakai hoken enrolment are creating a problem their staff will discover years later.
What are the work rules, and why do they matter so much?
Every employer with 10 or more employees must create work rules (shūgyō kisoku) and file them with the Labour Standards Inspection Office, after consulting employee representatives. The rules must cover working hours, wages, retirement and dismissal grounds, and they must be made accessible to employees.
Why they matter: the work rules, not the individual contract, are the operative document for most terms — and, critically, an employer cannot dismiss for conduct not specified as a ground in the work rules. A foreign parent that imports a US handbook and never files proper Japanese work rules has, in effect, disarmed itself: it cannot discipline, cannot dismiss, and cannot rely on transfer or retirement provisions it never validly adopted.
Changing work rules to employees’ disadvantage requires reasonableness and, in practice, consent or strong justification — so getting them right at the outset matters. This is the first document a competent Japanese employment lawyer will ask for, and its absence or inadequacy is the most common structural defect in foreign-owned Japanese subsidiaries.
Overtime, harassment, and the 2019 reforms
The Work Style Reform Act made overtime caps legally binding with criminal penalties: 45 hours a month and 360 a year in principle, with special-circumstance exceptions permitting up to 100 hours in one month and 720 a year, subject to multi-month averages. An employer must have a valid Article 36 agreement (saburoku kyōtei) with employee representatives to require any overtime at all, and must file it.
It also made five days of annual leave mandatory to take, with employer obligations and fines. And the Power Harassment Prevention Act (from 2020 for large employers, 2022 for SMEs) requires employers to establish consultation channels, investigate complaints, prevent retaliation, and take measures against workplace harassment — a genuine framework, and one that foreign-owned employers are often better at than domestic ones.
The recurring litigation risk is the kanrishoku (manager) exemption: employers designate staff as managers to avoid overtime liability, and courts strike the designation down where the person lacks genuine authority, discretion over their own working hours, and commensurate compensation — awarding years of back overtime with penalties. Audit every ‘manager’ designation against those three criteria; the ones that fail are unbooked liabilities.
Dismissal, contractors, and the reality of Japanese workforce management
You cannot lawfully dismiss without objectively reasonable grounds and social acceptability, and the remedy for getting it wrong is voidness plus back pay, not damages — per our Japan labor-law guide. Redundancy requires all four factors of the seiri kaiko test. In practice, Japanese employers exit people through negotiated voluntary retirement packages, and foreign employers should budget for the same.
What foreign employers must not do is what they instinctively try: pressuring an employee to resign through isolation, meaningless work, or repeated ‘suggestions’. This is recognised as oidashi-beya behaviour, it is increasingly treated as power harassment, and it converts a negotiable exit into a harassment claim with a union attached.
Contractors: the gyōmu itaku (service contract) is common, and misclassification tests look at subordination, direction, integration, and economic dependence, exactly as elsewhere in this series. The freelance protection law that took effect in November 2024 imposed new duties on companies engaging individual freelancers — written terms, prompt payment within 60 days, prohibited conduct — and tightened the environment considerably. A full-time ‘contractor’ working under your direction is an employee, and an employee cannot be dismissed.
EOR, entity, and the quarterly Japanese audit
An EOR gives compliant Japanese employment quickly — shakai hoken enrolment, payroll, year-end adjustment, compliant contracts — and is the right first move for one to five hires and for testing the market. The limit is the familiar one: visa sponsorship attaches to the real employer, so hiring foreign nationals who need a COE points toward a Japanese entity (a KK or GK, incorporable in weeks). Note also that an EOR does not lift the dismissal doctrine; it merely places the impossible dismissal in someone else’s name.
The genuine strategic case for Japan: exceptional engineering and manufacturing talent, low attrition (a direct consequence of the labour law), moderate employer costs, a weak yen that makes Japanese salaries internationally competitive for the employer, and a government actively liberalising skilled immigration. Against that: a labour market where mid-career hiring is still developing, and a legal regime where every hire is a long-term commitment.
The quarterly audit: COEs and residence cards current, with renewals filed early; HSP points reassessed for candidates and existing staff (a promotion or raise may push someone over 70 or 80); Hello Work notifications filed for every foreign hire and departure; shakai hoken enrolment complete and contributions current for every employee (their permanent residence depends on it); work rules filed, current, and adequate as a disciplinary basis; Article 36 overtime agreement valid and filed; actual overtime hours reconciled against the caps; ‘manager’ designations audited against the kanrishoku criteria; five days’ leave taken by everyone entitled; harassment channel live; freelancer contracts compliant with the 2024 law. One page, four times a year — and in Japan, the work-rules line is the one that makes all the others enforceable.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can we run a Japanese team on a US-style performance management system?
Not as a route to dismissal — a PIP that ends in termination will produce a void dismissal and back pay. You can use performance management for development, pay and promotion. But the exit, when it comes, is a negotiated package, and building your process on the assumption that you can fire underperformers will fail expensively.
How much do overtime claims actually cost?
Years of unpaid overtime plus penalties — and where an employee was wrongly designated a manager, the back-pay period can be long. It is the most common and most expensive Japanese employment litigation, it is straightforward for employees to prove using their own records, and the Labour Standards Inspection Office will pursue it for free.
Is the weak yen good or bad for hiring in Japan?
For the employer paying in yen from a dollar or euro budget, excellent — Japanese talent has rarely been cheaper in international terms. For retention, it is a growing risk: Japanese professionals are increasingly aware that their salaries lag global peers, and the best of them are becoming internationally mobile. Pay competitively in global terms, not merely in local ones.
Do we need to provide housing?
Not legally, but company housing (*shataku*) or a housing allowance is a common and valued benefit — and it solves the very real problem, described in our relocation guide, that many landlords refuse foreign tenants and move-in costs run to four to six months’ rent. For a foreign hire, an employer who handles housing has removed the single hardest part of their relocation.
Discover more from Kurums | Business Intelligence
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
