Japanese employment law makes dismissal extraordinarily difficult: the abusive dismissal doctrine (Labour Contract Act Article 16) voids any dismissal lacking objectively reasonable grounds and social acceptability — and courts apply it strictly, requiring employers to prove they tried everything else first. For redundancy, the four-factor test (business necessity, effort to avoid dismissal, reasonable selection, proper procedure) must all be satisfied. There is no statutory severance pay — but there is a strong custom of retirement allowances and negotiated exit packages. Employees get a minimum of 10 days’ paid leave rising with service (with five days now mandatory to take), and the 2019 work-style reforms capped overtime at 45 hours a month / 360 a year, with penalties.
In Japan, you effectively cannot be fired — and that fact explains almost everything else about Japanese working life. The lifetime-employment model was never law, but the courts built a doctrine that came close: a dismissal without objectively reasonable grounds and general social acceptability is void, full stop, and Japanese employers have spent seventy years designing around that constraint through transfers, demotions, pressure, and negotiated exits rather than dismissals. For a foreign professional this cuts both ways: your job is more secure than anywhere else in this series, and your employer’s alternatives to firing you can be uncomfortable. This guide covers the 2026 position: contract types, the abusive dismissal doctrine, the redundancy four-factor test, the retirement allowance, working hours after the 2019 reforms, paid leave, harassment law, and how disputes actually run.
Can I be fired in Japan?
Very rarely, lawfully. A dismissal is void unless it has objectively reasonable grounds and is socially acceptable — a bar Japanese courts set extremely high. Poor performance alone almost never suffices; the employer must show training, warnings, reassignment attempts, and that no alternative existed. Most exits are negotiated instead.
Is there statutory severance pay?
No — Japan has no statutory redundancy payment. What exists is 30 days’ notice (or pay in lieu), and a widespread *custom* of retirement allowances (taishokukin) at traditional employers, plus negotiated packages in exit situations, which for a foreign professional is where the real money is.
How much holiday do I get?
A statutory minimum of 10 days after six months, rising to 20 days at six and a half years’ service — and since 2019, employers must ensure employees actually take at least five days a year, with fines for failure. Japan’s problem was never entitlement; it was usage.
What contract types exist, and what is a seishain?
The central distinction in Japanese employment is seishain (regular, indefinite-term, full-time employees) versus non-regular workers (fixed-term contract employees, part-timers, dispatched/agency workers). Seishain status carries the full protection of the dismissal doctrine, the retirement-allowance customs, and the implicit expectation of long tenure — and, historically, of accepting transfers and reassignments the employer directs.
Fixed-term contracts have their own protections: since 2013, an employee on repeated fixed-term contracts totalling more than five years may demand conversion to an indefinite contract, and non-renewal of a repeatedly-renewed fixed-term contract can be treated like a dismissal (the yatoi-dome doctrine) requiring the same reasonable-grounds test.
The 2020 equal pay for equal work reforms require that unreasonable differences in treatment between regular and non-regular workers be eliminated — a significant change to a system built on precisely such differences. Foreign professionals are almost always hired as seishain or on fixed-term contracts with professional terms; know which, because the protections differ sharply.
How does the abusive dismissal doctrine actually work?
Article 16 of the Labour Contract Act: a dismissal that lacks objectively reasonable grounds and is not considered appropriate in general societal terms is an abuse of right and is void. Not compensable — void. The employee remains employed, with back pay from the dismissal date.
What courts require in practice for a performance dismissal: evidence of the poor performance, evidence that the employer provided training and guidance, evidence of warnings and opportunity to improve, evidence that reassignment to a suitable alternative role was considered and was impossible, and evidence that the process was fair. Japanese employers who simply document poor performance and dismiss lose — because documenting the problem is not the same as demonstrating that dismissal was the only remaining option.
For misconduct dismissals, the employer must show the conduct falls within the grounds specified in the work rules (shūgyō kisoku) — the company-wide rulebook that every employer with 10+ employees must file with the Labour Standards Inspection Office — and that the sanction is proportionate. A dismissal for conduct not specified in the work rules is generally void on that ground alone.
What is the four-factor test for redundancy?
Economic dismissal (seiri kaiko) must satisfy all four judicially-developed factors: 1. Business necessity — genuine need to reduce headcount (courts do not require insolvency, but they scrutinise); 2. Effort to avoid dismissal — the employer must show it tried alternatives: cutting executive pay, halting recruitment, reducing overtime, seeking voluntary resignations, reassignment, and temporary transfers (shukkō) to affiliates; 3. Reasonable selection criteria — objective, non-arbitrary, applied consistently; 4. Proper procedure — explanation and consultation with employees and any union.
Fail any one and the dismissal is void. This is why Japanese companies facing downturns cut bonuses, freeze hiring, transfer staff to subsidiaries, and run voluntary early-retirement programmes with enhanced packages — often extremely generous ones — rather than making anyone redundant. The voluntary retirement package (kibō taishoku) is the Japanese equivalent of the French rupture conventionnelle from our France chapter: the mechanism through which the system actually adjusts.
For a foreign employee, the practical implication is important: if your employer wants you gone, they will likely offer a package rather than dismiss you — and that package is negotiable, because their alternative (a void dismissal, back pay, and an employee they must reinstate) is far worse than yours.
What is the retirement allowance, and how does compensation really work?
Japan has no statutory severance, but many employers — particularly larger and traditional ones — operate a retirement allowance (taishokukin): a lump sum on departure calculated on base salary and years of service, with the formula set out in the work rules. Where it exists, it is contractually binding through those rules, it typically pays far more for long service and for company-initiated departures than for resignations, and it receives highly favourable tax treatment (a substantial deduction based on years of service, then half the remainder taxed separately) — making it one of the most tax-efficient forms of compensation in this series.
Compensation structure more broadly: base salary plus bonuses (typically two to five months’ worth annually, paid summer and winter — nominally discretionary, practically expected), plus allowances (commuting, housing, family — which at traditional employers can be substantial), plus overtime pay for non-managerial staff. Foreign professionals at international firms usually receive Western-style packages; those at Japanese companies should understand the allowance and bonus structure before comparing offers.
The manager (kanrishoku) exemption from overtime pay is heavily litigated: employers designate staff as managers to avoid overtime liability, and courts routinely find the designation invalid where the person lacks genuine managerial authority, discretion over their own hours, and commensurate pay — awarding years of back overtime. If you are a ‘manager’ without real authority, you may be owed a great deal.
What did the 2019 work-style reforms change?
The Work Style Reform Act was Japan’s response to karōshi — death from overwork — and it did three significant things. It imposed legally binding overtime caps: 45 hours a month and 360 a year in principle, with special circumstances permitting up to 100 hours in a single month and 720 a year, subject to averages — and, crucially, with criminal penalties for breach, where before there had been only a toothless agreement system.
It made five days of annual leave mandatory to take each year for employees entitled to ten or more — addressing Japan’s chronic under-usage of holiday, where employees left most of their entitlement unclaimed. Employers must ensure it happens, and are fined if it does not.
And it introduced equal pay for equal work, requiring justification for differences in treatment between regular and non-regular employees. Alongside, the 2020 Power Harassment Prevention Act obliged employers to take measures against workplace harassment — establishing consultation channels, investigating complaints, and preventing retaliation — giving Japanese employees a formal harassment framework for the first time. These are real changes, and the working culture is shifting, unevenly but genuinely.
How do disputes run — and what should expats document?
Three routes. Labour Standards Inspection Offices handle wage, overtime, and safety violations administratively — free, and effective for unpaid overtime claims. Labour Tribunals (rōdōoryū) are the workhorse: a three-session process, typically concluded in about three months, mixing mediation and adjudication, with most cases settling — fast and accessible by the standards of this series. Ordinary civil litigation follows for the rest, and takes years.
Foreign workers can also join general unions that accept individual members (including several English-speaking ones), which can demand collective bargaining on your behalf — an unusually effective tool that foreign employees in Japan consistently under-use. An employer must bargain in good faith with a union representing even a single employee.
Documentation: the work rules (request a copy — you are entitled to access), the contract, payslips, records of your actual working hours (keep your own; employers’ records may under-record), any written warnings, and a dated log of everything if pressure begins. In a system where dismissal is nearly impossible, the employee who does not resign and does not sign is in a very strong position — and knowing that is most of the battle.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is lifetime employment still a thing?
At large traditional employers, substantially yes — and the legal doctrine that underpins it is entirely intact regardless of corporate fashion. What has changed is mid-career hiring (now common), job-hopping (increasingly normal), and startup culture. But the dismissal doctrine applies to every employer, old or new, foreign or Japanese.
What is the ‘kanrishoku’ overtime exemption?
The exemption of genuine managers from overtime pay — and the source of enormous litigation, because employers designate people as managers who lack real authority. Courts look at actual decision-making power, discretion over your own hours, and pay commensurate with the status. If you are a ‘manager’ who cannot set your own schedule, you may be owed years of overtime.
Can my employer transfer me to another city?
Traditionally yes — the work rules typically reserve broad transfer rights (*tenkin*), and courts have upheld them as the flip side of strong job security. The limits are abuse of right and serious disadvantage to the employee (particularly family circumstances). Foreign professionals should read the transfer clause; it is the price of the security.
How generous are voluntary retirement packages?
Often very — because the employer’s alternative is a dismissal that would be void. Packages of six months to two years’ salary are seen, and they are negotiable. If you are offered one, do not accept the first number, and do not resign before negotiating: your leverage is at its maximum precisely when they need your signature.
Discover more from Kurums | Business Intelligence
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
